6

The question was flagged by users as not an answer, probably because of how it was phrased. The title of the question asked for modification while body also indicated requests for video deletion. I'm guessing everyone had the same thought that the main drive for the question was moving videos around (which was pretty nifty) and not the deletion feature. ...


2

The original meta question has been closed and deleted. It was a rant about a comment that was made on the answer, and was largely impertinent and nonsensical. I don't think it's worth dredging up, and the link could only be viewed by 10K members anyway. If you are truly curious, I can provided it to you.


2

This site's scope doesn't encompasses all the possible discussions about web applications, it is focused on using web applications. i.e. questions about web applications policies are off-topic Are questions regarding website policies on-topic? Do we need a close reason for questions asking about proprietary/non-public information or policies? Web ...


1

I can't speak to the moderator's actions, but there's no way that the question is highly regarded by the "community". The usual activity on this site would never see a question get that many votes in that little amount of time. It's obviously getting voted on by people who don't spend all that much time here. I see several pages of new users who've joined in ...


Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible