Without commenting any further on the specifics, I can tell you that we're aware of this and are taking action.


The votes that you are referring aren't "serial downvoting" b/c the referred questions didn't include any research effort, they were very short (meaning unclear / brevivity should not sacrifice clarity), and they were not viciously choosen. In new tab of the main site Questions page I found a bad question, as the OP is a >10k rep user before ...


I know only the voters know why they think it's bad This is, unfortunately, the crux of it. I'm sorry that someone didn't leave a comment as to how it could be improved. I don't see much, if anything, wrong with the question. The only thing that someone might take issue with (and again, I can't speak for the rationale of the voters) is that I wonder ...

Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible