Tag notes is attached to six Open Qs at present:
Where there seems to be a mixture of application specific meanings and vernacular usage.
The tag has three followers and no Usage guide. In no case is it the only tag. There are a further eight Closed Qs so tagged, a proportion that may serve as a warning of problems. IMO the As to Shog9’s criteria for burnination, summarised as:
- Does it describe the contents of the questions to which it is applied?
- Is it unambiguous?
- Is the concept described even on-topic for the site?
- Does the tag add any meaningful information to the post?
- Does it mean the same thing in all common contexts?
are, in order: No, No, Depends, No, No.
There is already a tag with a Usage guide annotations (four Open Qs):
Annotations are typically used to point out, or explain a specific portion of content, such as in YouTube videos.
which would seem adequate to cover the vernacular usage, if required. The jargon usage (eg Evernote, Tumblr) might also be confused with other applications such as OneNote.
Would anyone care to speak in its defence in a trial for its life?