Skip to main content
Web Applications

Return to Question

replaced http://superuser.com/ with https://superuser.com/
Source Link
Community Bot
Community Bot
  • 1

Since Hotmail has become Outlook.com there have been a lot of questions on this SE about the transition and about changes to functionality. Many questions just refer to "Outlook" or use the "Outlook" tag when they're actually asking about "Outlook.com" (arguably a different beast entirely).

Any questions here will almost certainly be about Outlook.com, as any Outlook-related questions would probably end up on Super UserSuper User. So, should we go through and change references from Outlook to Outlook.com where applicable? Setting these as synonyms would probably suffice for tagging, but what about question titles and bodies - are they worth editing en masse?

Since Hotmail has become Outlook.com there have been a lot of questions on this SE about the transition and about changes to functionality. Many questions just refer to "Outlook" or use the "Outlook" tag when they're actually asking about "Outlook.com" (arguably a different beast entirely).

Any questions here will almost certainly be about Outlook.com, as any Outlook-related questions would probably end up on Super User. So, should we go through and change references from Outlook to Outlook.com where applicable? Setting these as synonyms would probably suffice for tagging, but what about question titles and bodies - are they worth editing en masse?

Since Hotmail has become Outlook.com there have been a lot of questions on this SE about the transition and about changes to functionality. Many questions just refer to "Outlook" or use the "Outlook" tag when they're actually asking about "Outlook.com" (arguably a different beast entirely).

Any questions here will almost certainly be about Outlook.com, as any Outlook-related questions would probably end up on Super User. So, should we go through and change references from Outlook to Outlook.com where applicable? Setting these as synonyms would probably suffice for tagging, but what about question titles and bodies - are they worth editing en masse?

Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackWebApps/status/333849307717451776
Source Link
Andrew Lott
Andrew Lott
  • 2.5k
  • 11
  • 7

Outlook vs Outlook.com

Since Hotmail has become Outlook.com there have been a lot of questions on this SE about the transition and about changes to functionality. Many questions just refer to "Outlook" or use the "Outlook" tag when they're actually asking about "Outlook.com" (arguably a different beast entirely).

Any questions here will almost certainly be about Outlook.com, as any Outlook-related questions would probably end up on Super User. So, should we go through and change references from Outlook to Outlook.com where applicable? Setting these as synonyms would probably suffice for tagging, but what about question titles and bodies - are they worth editing en masse?